A new Pull Request was created by @waredjeb for CMSSW_14_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/Integration (dqm)
• DQM/PFTasks (dqm)

@tjavaid, @cmsbuild, @rvenditti, @antoniovagnerini, @syuvivida, @nothingface0 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @batinkov, @francescobrivio this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Add ParticleFlow Client for Online DQM - GPUvsCPU comparison #45079

cms-bot internal usage

backport of #45079

please test

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-684ae6/39848/summary.html
COMMIT: 2ab99a4
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-06-11-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45204/39848/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 86 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 42 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3338712
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3338689
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

Hello @waredjeb
Would you like this PR to be deployed for the coming data on Sunday? We tested this PR with 14_0_8 and run 381286 and you could inspect plots at the playback DQMGUI here. However, we are expected to run with 14_0_9, and with new streamer format, we could only test with the streamers of run 381549 (which didn't have HCAL included). Not sure if it is because of this, all the 2D plots in the 'ParticleFlow/ pfCaloGPUCompDir' are empty when testing with 14_0_9 and run 381549 test streamers were empty

Hello @waredjeb Would you like this PR to be deployed for the coming data on Sunday? We tested this PR with 14_0_8 and run 381286 and you could inspect plots at the playback DQMGUI here. However, we are expected to run with 14_0_9, and with new streamer format, we could only test with the streamers of run 381549 (which didn't have HCAL included). Not sure if it is because of this, all the 2D plots in the 'ParticleFlow/ pfCaloGPUCompDir' are empty when testing with 14_0_9 and run 381549 test streamers were empty

Yes. we would like to deploy this PR in the coming data on Sunday! Thank you!
Regarding run 381549 test streamers, if HCAL was not available, empty plots are okay. The PFCluster collection in consideration comes from HCAL only.

+1

• P5 tests OK. (thanks @syuvivida )

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

type pf

+1

Hello @waredjeb
This pfgpu client has just been deployed in online DQM (together with 14_0_9), starting from run 381944.

Hello @waredjeb This pfgpu client has just been deployed in online DQM (together with 14_0_9), starting from run 381944.

Hi @syuvivida Thank you very much!

BTW, the DQM shifter is asking they shall monitor the plots. When the PF group is ready to include shift instruction, please let us know. Thanks!!